Taxing the rich is not a magic trick that will help younger Canadians

Article content material

I’ve all the time been fascinated by magicians and the way unimaginable a few of their tips are. Just a few years in the past, my youngest son grew to become fascinated as nicely. He aggressively took up the craft and let me in on a few of the sleight-of-hand and distraction abilities which might be required to tug off an efficient trick.

With this in thoughts, I couldn’t assist however consider magicians with respect to the Canadian authorities’s 2024 budget and its proposal to extend the capital gains inclusion rate from 50 per cent to 66.7 per cent for firms, trusts and people who’ve greater than $250,000 in annual capital good points realized after June 25, 2024.

Article content material

Article content material

The federal government plans to boost nearly $5 billion from companies (who would possibly purposely set off, or “crystallize,” their capital good points earlier than June 25) to finance a few of its extreme spending. That’s fairly a magic trick.

To introduce the proposal, the federal government pulled one other assault on the rich and so-called wealthy out of its outdated bag of tips. Apparently, the proposal will solely impression 0.13 per cent of Canadian individuals and 12.6 per cent of companies. This messaging is blatantly disingenuous and manipulative. The actual impression might be a lot larger.

To cowl their tracks, the prime minister and his authorities have vigorously began defending their funds. Final week, Justin Trudeau constantly argued that the capital good points inclusion fee improve is important because the present system is unfair to younger individuals who can’t afford to purchase a primary residence and that it’s time for wealthier and older people to pay extra to work in the direction of “intergenerational fairness.”

He additionally mentioned: “We simply don’t assume it’s proper {that a} pupil, or an electrician or a trainer be paying taxes on 100 per cent of their earnings whereas others have the alternatives to make use of accountants and pay taxes on solely 50 per cent of that earnings.”

Article content material

Article content material

These feedback are traditional sleight-of-hand responses (so clearly crafted by the prime minister’s workplace or communications’ disaster staff) to distract us from the actual points.

Intergenerational equity and asking the so-called wealthy to pay extra tax through an elevated capital good points inclusion fee is sort of a leap of logic. How that pull of the coverage lever assists with intergenerational equity is definitely not seen to me and tens of millions of others.

If Trudeau genuinely desires to take optimistic steps in the direction of intergenerational equity, crucial factor could be to scale back spending and get our nation’s debt load again in line. Finances 2024 initiatives our public-debt charges will be $54.1 billion for the approaching 12 months (that’s greater than $1 billion per week) and is sort of equivalent to the quantity projected to be collected in GST by the federal authorities. Take into consideration that: all our GST funds are going to pay public-debt fees.

Paying public-debt fees brings no societal advantages (no hospitals, roads, social advantages, and so forth.) and as an alternative advantages bondholders. Burdening our kids and grandchildren with our nation’s rising debt, and its corresponding debt fees, is definitely not within the pursuits of intergenerational equity.

Article content material

The assault on one in all our nation’s most vital professions — accountants — can also be fairly exceptional. A sitting prime minister states that in the event you can afford to rent an accountant, then these evil accountants will be capable of reduce your tax invoice in half. Apart from being terribly offensive to the occupation, accountants are actually apparently magicians: Abracadabra …poof … your tax invoice is reduce in half.

Such hogwash. A lot in order that the Chartered Skilled Accountants of Canada got here out with a strong statement defending the honour of accountants. Accountants are hardly the issue. Frankly, with out accountants, your entire Canadian tax system would fail. That’s not an exaggeration; it’s the easy reality.

Whereas some economists have strongly come out in defence of the capital good points inclusion fee (with such arguments often centred round fairness — a “buck is a buck” — or “it’s one of the best of a foul various”), they’re ignoring the actual world of investing. Traders place their {dollars} the place they really feel the backyard has fertile rising circumstances. If that evaluation determines this backyard just isn’t fertile sufficient, they’ll place their funding {dollars} elsewhere.

Article content material

To be truthful, many entrepreneurs, economists and tax-policy wonks would have been extra accepting of the tax improve if it was met with measures, reminiscent of a major discount in company and private tax charges, to counter the destructive impacts described above. These measures, mixed with lowered spending, would have helped make the financial backyard a bit extra fertile and been a optimistic step in coping with our nation’s serious productivity issues.

As an alternative, the capital good points tax improve was accompanied by offensive rhetoric, deceptive and disingenuous statistics, and a sleight of hand trick (“intergenerational equity”) to deflect consideration from what this measure actually is: a easy political assault within the hopes of accelerating votes from the youthful era.

For a lot of profitable Canadians, this tax improve is the ultimate straw. They’ve endured infinite assaults through the previous 9 years within the type of elevated private tax charges, harsh amendments to the choice minimal tax, illogical and ideological windfall taxes on the monetary sector (what sector is subsequent?), assaults on short-term rental house owners, assaults on small companies with anti-income splitting guidelines, grinds on the small-business deduction in case you have an excessive amount of passive earnings, threats of a wealth tax, and so forth. It’s an excessive amount of.

Article content material

My cellphone/electronic mail/textual content messages have been off the charts with requests from folks wanting assist to go away Canada as soon as and for all. Such exits have sadly been all too frequent over the previous variety of years, however this remaining straw has taken it to a brand new stage.

Fortunately, many Canadians are recognizing that the magic present is sort of over. They’ll solely be tricked so usually into believing that broad-based tax will increase and poor insurance policies are good for all Canadians. The magic is solely not actual.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Non-public Consumer, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax group. He might be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimmoody.

_____________________________________________________________

In the event you like this story, join the FP Investor E-newsletter.

_____________________________________________________________

Bookmark our web site and assist our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information it’s worthwhile to know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material