Dr. Day is skeptical: “I have never seen nice printed knowledge on [the benefits of PRF for skin,],” she says. “I don’t [offer PRF] for the pores and skin, as a result of I have been following [its use] in Europe for many years and I have never seen a lot profit. I’ve seen folks sad with the outcomes, and even individuals who have scarring from it. I actually speak folks out of it.”
And also you won’t need PRF for plumping up your nasal labial folds: “PRF is being offered as filler, however I do not suppose it really works like filler,” says Dr. Day.
So why are extra folks taken with PRF? There’s a newness issue, for positive. There’s a consolation issue (whether or not or not it’s warranted), in one thing that’s derived from your individual physique. After which there’s this: Extra “sufferers are on the lookout for alternate options to filler,” says Ava Shamban, MD, a board-certified dermatologist in Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, who provides PRF therapies in her personal observe. We’re dwelling in a time of “filler fatigue”—fueled by sufferers who “expertise sagging, heaviness, or stretched-out tissues from overfilling and improper methods [like poor] product placement,” says Dr. Shamban. However regardless of all of the speak of filler fatigue, we’re additionally getting extra injectables—fillers have been up 4 p.c in 2023, as in comparison with 2022, in response to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’ survey and trend report. We wish to look younger. However we don’t wish to look crammed. That makes “a extra ‘pure’ product for pores and skin revitalization and rejuvenation” a tempting proposition, says Dr. Shamban. She is extra optimistic about PRF’s potential, however agrees with Dr. Day that it’s not an alternative to hyaluronic acid filler, as a result of it doesn’t have the identical energy or volumizing skills, and it breaks down quicker. Nevertheless, she sees a world through which it’s doable PRF could possibly be mixed with filler. It could possibly be a useful software for particular sufferers—“as suppliers, we’ve an enormous array of merchandise, however it’s about 25% the merchandise chosen and 75% methods and injection fashion that make a distinction,” says Dr. Shamban.
What does the FDA should say about utilizing a affected person’s blood to probably regenerate their pores and skin? In keeping with Dr. Shamban, the FDA views PRP and PRF equally to a tissue switch. “They’re anxious about contamination, like if [the blood] is wrongly processed,” she explains, including that the recognition of PRF and PRP therapies at medspas versus board-certified dermatologists means there may probably be a mix-up of affected person samples. For reference, a New Mexico spa got here below fireplace after three folks have been contaminated with HIV after receiving PRP facials. The FDA has issued a warning letter in opposition to regenerative medication merchandise that embrace stem cells. Within the letter, the FDA cautions, “There’s lots of deceptive data on the web about these merchandise, together with statements in regards to the circumstances they can be utilized to deal with. FDA is anxious that many sufferers in search of cures and cures could also be misled by details about merchandise which can be illegally marketed, haven’t been proven to be protected or efficient, and, in some circumstances, could have important issues of safety that put sufferers in danger.” We reached out to the FDA to ask if PRF injections could be included on this warning, and at press time, had not acquired affirmation.
To learn extra injectable information:
