Canadians not getting enough value for their tax dollars

Article content material

Final week, The Fraser Institute launched its 2024 version of its publication Taxes versus the Necessities of Life: The Canadian Consumer Tax Index, which tracks the total tax bill of the common Canadian household from 1961 to 2023. It’s a captivating learn to see how a lot the common Canadian pays in taxes — not simply income tax, however different taxes like property taxes, GST, carbon taxes and oblique taxes, as properly.

Article content material

Sure, some loud voices on social media — particularly some left-of-centre economists and partisans — scream loudly that this report is flawed. Primarily, from what I can inform, they don’t consider that oblique taxes — corresponding to company taxes — must be included within the evaluation (and likewise that they merely don’t just like the Institute for repeatedly calling out fiscal irresponsibility) however I truly assume it’s properly accomplished, as a result of any taxes, even these borne not directly, add to an individual’s cost of living. At a minimal, it’s good meals for thought.

Some highlights from the report:

• “In 2023, the common Canadian household earned an earnings of $109,235 and paid in whole taxes equalling $46,988”
• “In different phrases, the common Canadian household spent 43.0 per cent of its earnings on taxes in comparison with 35.6 per cent on fundamental requirements.”
• “This can be a dramatic shift since 1961 when the common Canadian household spent a lot much less of its earnings on taxes (33.5 per cent) than the fundamental requirements (56.5 per cent). Taxes have grown rather more quickly than another single expenditure for the common Canadian household.”
• “Since 1961, the common Canadian household’s whole tax invoice has elevated nominally by 2,705 per cent, dwarfing will increase in annual housing prices (2,006 per cent), clothes (478 per cent) and meals (901 per cent).” 

Article content material

Article content material

Soak up these statistics for even 30 seconds. The truth that the common Canadian household now pays — and has for some time — extra in taxes than the requirements of life is mind-boggling. After I communicate on this topic at lectures or conferences, I usually take a look at the viewers to see in the event that they know what the common Canadian household pays in taxes in comparison with the fundamental requirements of life. The guesses I get are often manner off.  When the precise proper reply is given, there are sometimes shocked seems and a few audible gasps.  Nevertheless, when the logic is defined in additional element, the viewers largely understands.

The straightforward reality is that the common Canadian household has much less disposable earnings of their pockets than ever and elevated total taxes is an enormous cause for this. This leaves much less cash for issues corresponding to financial savings, leisure, journey and higher dwelling preparations.

The spillover impact is damaging. For instance, with much less disposable earnings, some could not have the ability to buy a house for fairly a while if ever. Whereas the basis reason behind Canada’s present housing shortage is usually self-inflicted given very poor federal immigration policies (we’re taking in much more immigrants than we’re capable of home), much less disposable earnings for Canadians can also be a contributing issue particularly with elevated costs (since demand exceeds provide).

Article content material

For my part, coverage makers have to pay shut consideration to research and monitoring like that of the current report. It’s time to return to the Sixties and Nineteen Eighties, when, rightfully, Canadians spent extra on the requirements of life than to help bloated governments. Nevertheless, it could be a monumental effort to get again to that state of affairs.

It begins with considerably diminished authorities spending. The cuts must be swift, deep and large enough to allow the federal authorities to carry down private earnings tax charges throughout the board to a extra cheap and aggressive stage. This could all be a part of a big re-think of our present private, enterprise and gross sales tax regimes. And we must be bold in our thinking.

Total, Canadians have to genuinely mirror on whether or not they’re getting good worth for his or her tax {dollars}. Sure, I perceive that taxes are one of many costs we pay for a steady nation that gives essential infrastructure and help for its most susceptible residents. However there are limits. One other current Fraser Institute poll on this subject discovered that 74 per cent of Canadians surveyed really feel that the common household is being over-taxed by federal, provincial and native governments. I concur.

Article content material

For instance, the population of the federal public service in 2015 was 257,034 folks. As of March 31, 2024, it has grown to 367,772. That’s a rise of 110,738 or 43.1 per cent in 9 years, far above the 15.2 per cent improve within the total inhabitants of Canada throughout that point interval. That’s unimaginable.

Taking this evaluation a bit additional, the Canada Revenue Agency’s headcount throughout 2015 was 40,059 folks. For 2024, it’s 59,155 or a 47.6 per cent improve.

The CRA has an important job to do in administrating Canada’s tax laws. Nevertheless, have Canadians acquired good worth for such a dramatic improve within the CRA headcount? My opinion is an emphatic “no.” I say this due to my experiences of lengthy phone wait occasions to debate routine issues, quite a few and prolonged delays in processing objections, delays within the processing of routine credit corresponding to international tax credit, audits for issues which can be wholly ridiculous, together with the irritating incompetence of many new hires.

Former United States President Ronald Reagan as soon as famously stated: “The federal government’s view of the financial system could be summed up in a number of quick phrases.  If it strikes, tax it. If it retains shifting, regulate it.  And if it stops shifting it, subsidize it.”

Article content material

There’s numerous knowledge in that quote.

Canada, it’s properly previous time to demand extra worth for our taxation {dollars}.

Kim Moody, FCPA, FCA, TEP, is the founding father of Moodys Tax/Moodys Personal Consumer, a former chair of the Canadian Tax Basis, former chair of the Society of Property Practitioners (Canada) and has held many different management positions within the Canadian tax neighborhood. He could be reached at kgcm@kimgcmoody.com and his LinkedIn profile is https://www.linkedin.com/in/kimgcmoody.

_____________________________________________________________

If you happen to like this story, join the FP Investor Publication.

_____________________________________________________________

Bookmark our web site and help our journalism: Don’t miss the enterprise information you should know — add financialpost.com to your bookmarks and join our newsletters here.

Article content material